Hi All.
I think the entire ser community would agree that this is not really the best way to manage external connectivity to ser. It's just a maintenance nightmare - so an abstraction layer is desperately needed.
I'm also have the opinion that the FIFO needs to be phased out and completely replaced with a real network server.
Just my $0.02 worth.
Regards, Paul
On 4/15/05, Juha Heinanen jh@tutpro.com wrote:
Marian Dumitru writes:
similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
i tried it and it worked ok for some functions and not for some others. also, it currently doesn't support an allowed clients file or database table.
there is something wrong in the design of external access to ser. an abstraction layer is missing between modules and external access methods. so each module has to currently support fifo, unix socket, and also tcp/udp interface.
-- juha
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers