22 Jul
2015
22 Jul
'15
1:48 p.m.
Hi,
It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with the
module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the meantime,
you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 July 2015 at 11:41, Asgaroth <00asgaroth00(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Any thoughts on this, I can provide actual examples for this, however, I
would rather not send valid subsciber info directly to the list.
If anyone is available for looking into it I can send the relevent
information/examples directly to them.
Thanks
On 21/07/2015 15:03, Asgaroth wrote:
--
*** We're rebranding! Learn more here
<http://www.sipcentric.com/2015/07/were-rebranding/> ***
www.sipcentric.com
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered
office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street,
Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have 2 devices registering with the same AOR,
I have the registrar module's max_contacts parameter set to 1 and I use the
0x04 flag on the save function.
When I use dmq_usrloc for replication, I can see 2 contacts registered
for the AOR on the "client" nodes whereas the node where the actual
registration took place only has 1 contact for the AOR.
Is this expected behaviour of the dmq_usrloc module in terms of
registration or have a come accross another bug?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users