12 Jul
2007
12 Jul
'07
3:21 a.m.
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
Me 2. Possibly even put all that into a new rr module (rr2? recroute?).
Regards,
Martin
PS: Why is this thread send to serdev twice? Or is there a difference
between serdev(a)iptel.org and serdev(a)lists.iptel.org?
But such a seperation would mean a change in the
behavior again, because
currently preloaded requests are also handled by loose_route() (it returns
true for these requests). So it would be only an option to change this in
head.
I would vote to make totally new functions which also have a better
naming. Then people can use the old function with old behavior or the
new functions with new behavior.