21 Jun
2005
21 Jun
'05
2:01 p.m.
Undocummented code = non existing code (for almomst everyone except the developer and few
guys reading the devel list, updating the working copy of the CVS, and checking the new
code).....I know it is unpleasant, but two lines with an overview is not asking too
much.....isn't it?
my contribution,
Samuel.
Unclassified.
>> Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org> 06/21/05
11:58AM >>>
On 21-06-2005 09:20, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Greger V. Teigre writes:
Are you suggesting that commits should be rejected if they do not
update documentation as well ? What is better, having undocumented
code or having no code ?
Jan.
_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
serdev(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
Let's try to make 0.9.x documentation as
complete as possible now
leading up to the release!!
nathelper README doesn't describe all nat_uac_test modes. tm module
README seems to lack description of several exported functions.
these both are example of bad iptel.org policy. no new features should
be allowed to be added/changed in the code unless also the documentation
is updated.