Latest SER should fallback to other known destinations if the first does not reply within timer B/F based on multiple SRV and/or A/AAA records. If not, please open bug on tracker.iptel.org :-)
Michal
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:15 -0700, Jai Rangi wrote:
This is very elegant, However we are using lcr module for load distribution. The advantage is that if one server is not available/busy then ser will send call to another.
-Jai www.bingotelecom.com
On 9/13/07, Michal Matyska michal@iptel.org wrote: This BIND zone file should do the job. Requests relayed to abc.com should go 60% to gw1 and 40% to gw2.
$TTL 86400 $ORIGIN abc.com. @ IN SOA ns.abc.com root ( 1 ; serial 1H ; refresh 10M ; retry 1W ; expiry 1D ) ; minimum ; service rr pri weight port target _sip._udp SRV 10 60 5060 gw1 SRV 10 40 5060 gw2 gw1 A 192.168.1.1 gw2 A 192.168.1.2 On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 17:54 +0200, inge wrote: > Hi, > > Can we used DNS SRV for outgoing call ? Can you show me an example ? > > Thanks. > > Sincerly, > > Adrien .L > > Le jeudi 13 septembre 2007 à 10:16 -0400, Michal Matyska a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > in SER 2.0 you can use DNS system with properly configured SRV records > > to achieve load balancing with non-equal distribution. > > > > Michal > > > > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Is there a way to have something like a loadbalancing on SER for > > > outgoing calls ? > > > > > > I want to distribute the calls between two gateways. Ideally, with a > > > coefficient (ie. 60% for the first and 40% for the second). > > > > > > Thanks for your support. > > > > > > Adrien .L > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > Serusers@lists.iptel.org > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers