23 Apr
2005
23 Apr
'05
6:10 p.m.
Elena,
But from what I can see, 4xx, 5xx and 6xx refer to
"errors" as per the RFC. It would be nice if there was
another sequence (such as 9xx) for informational
purposes only.
Thanks
--- Elena Ramona Modroiu <ramona(a)voice-system.ro>
wrote:
You could you a new reply code from classes 4xx or
5xx (these two look
more appropriate, although you can use a 6xx reply
too -- see chapter 21
in RFC3261 about reply codes) with a special reason
phrase (Call
forwarding enabled). Many phones display the reason
phrase and that
should help the caller to understand what happened.
A nicer way, imo, is to redirect the call to an
announcement server that
plays a confirmation message.
Ramona
Dave wrote:
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I am using avpops to allow services such as
call-forwarding, dnd, etc. I want to allow the
users
to be able to enter sequences such as *982223333,
implying that he wants call forwarding enabled and
the
number to forward to is 2223333.
Question: Once SER gets the INVITE and stores the
number to forward in an AVP, what response should
SER
send back to the UA? It cannot be 200 OK. I would
like
to send a response that basically displays
"Call
forwarding enabled" and ends the transaction.
Thanks in advance
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers