27 Jan
2004
27 Jan
'04
1 p.m.
Hello
Again, thank you very much. But with your answers, newer questions
appear.
Well, If I have understood all right, with RTP proxy I can establish a
communication between v4 and v6 clients, so I can 'jump' the problem of
not SDP translations. Is this OK?
And I would like to ask you about the simplest scenario I can imagine
to interconnect IPv4 and IPv6.
A box (probably IBM with Linux or Sun/Solaris 8) with two cards, one
IPv6 and other one IPv4. This box acts as a Proxy Server and Registrar.
But it can acts as IPv6/IPv4 translator (I just have to configure
ser.cfg to listen on both cards and enable Record-route, haven't I?).
And finally this box can acts as RTP Proxy. So, all the features on the
same machine. What do you think about this scenario?
Does RTP Proxy work on Solaris 8?
Thank you very much
Curro
----- Mensaje Original -----
De: "Klaus Darilion" <darilion(a)ict.tuwien.ac.at>
Fecha: Martes, Enero 27, 2004 11:05 am
Asunto: RE: [Serusers] SER, IPv6, IPv6/IPv4 interworking and more
Put into the ser proxy a second NIC and configure it
as IPv6 only.
enable Record-route and ser will do the v4-v6 translation. For
establishing an RTP-stream between v4 and v6 clients you can use
rtpproxy. Take a look of the recent rtpproxy thread in the mailing
list,there are some explanations what is already supported by
rtpproxy and
what has to be done.
klaus
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-----Original Message-----
From: CURRO_DOMINGUEZ [mailto:CURRO_DOMINGUEZ@terra.es]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 10:49 AM
To: Jan Janak; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER, IPv6, IPv6/IPv4 interworking and more
Ouch!! Not IPv4/IPv6 translation of SDP addresses?
Thanks Klaus and Jan for your answers. Well, I thought on a
device with
2 network cards because I want to divide IPv6 and IPv4 networks.
Do you know whether SER is going to be able to translate SDP
addresses
in the near future?
I have another question. Is the SIP IPv4 server a mandatory
device in
this scenario? I mean, I think I can use the SIP
IPv6 server and
the
IPv6/IPv4 translator and nothing else. In this
way, IPv4
devices would
have the translator as SIP Proxy, and the translator would
redirect
thier request to the IPv6 SIP server. So there
would be one
domain and
one registrar.
What do you think about this? Is this possible?
Thank you very much
Curro
----- Mensaje Original -----
De: Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>
Fecha: Lunes, Enero 26, 2004 12:53 pm
Asunto: Re: [Serusers] SER, IPv6, IPv6/IPv4 interworking and more
> As mentioned by Klaus, one network device with both IPv4 and IPv6
> addresses will do the job. You then need to configure ser to
> listen on
> both of them and make sure that record-routing is enabled.
>
> SER can translate SIP signalling, what it can not done yet is
IPv4-
> IPv6translation of SDP addresses.
>
> Jan.
>
> On 26-01 11:00, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> > You don't need two network cards, one is enough. This
interface
> must be
> > configured with an IPv4 and an IPv6 address.
> >
> > Klaus
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: CURRO_DOMINGUEZ [mailto:CURRO_DOMINGUEZ@terra.es]
> > > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 10:49 AM
> > > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: [Serusers] SER, IPv6, IPv6/IPv4 interworking and more
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > After installing and running over last month SER, we are
going
> to the
> > > next step. Our final goal is to deploy a SIP network which
> allows SIP
> > > clients Voice Call, Videoconference (RTP), Instant Message
and
> > > Presence. And we want to use IPv6
and IPv4 networks.
> > >
> > > I wonder several questions about this:
> > >
> > > I'll use a SER server for IPv4 network and another for
IPv6
> network,
> > > but how I connect them? I think that I need a device with
two
> network
> > > cards connected each one to IPv4 or IPv6. Which software
has
> to run
> > > this device to act as a SIP Protocol Gateway? Can SER do this?
> > >
> > > Do you think that with the two proxy SER servers and the
SIP
Protocol
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> Gateway would be enough or that I need
another device to
> develope this?
>
> Thank you very much for your time and responses
>
> Curro
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers