23 Nov
2006
23 Nov
'06
6:39 a.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Nov 23, 2006 at 11:43, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
[...]
Ok. I've meant openser core vs ser 0.9.4, or if you want what openser
core has extra compared to ser 0.10.99 (speaking of bigger features,
probably only the statistics part and the new MI, which seems to
correspond to ser's RPC, so I wouldn't call it an extra, but
re-inventing the wheel).
If we are talking the other way arround, ser core has evolved much more
(avps in script, select, timers, dns, blacklist a.s.o).
That's one of the reason I'm suggesting that it would be a good ideea
to switch to it (and at least tm), besides performance tunning and
extra-testing.
I would be happy if openser would switch to Ottendorf's core. But seeing
all the changes in Ottendorf I think it will be quite complex to use
Ottendorf's core inside openser.
regards
klaus
--
Klaus Darilion
nic.at
I've
tried looking at openser core & tm commits and I haven't seen any
significant changes (and this is not a flamewar attempt).
Aren't the pseudo
variables vs. select framework significant changes?
Also TLS in core vs. TLS as module?