[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS

Again, playing Devil's advocate: Doesn't that use TCP? It feels like: * HTTP evil based solely on anecdotal evidence. I know you have a LOT of history, and I don't want downplay your experience, but I'm showing empirically how this can work, and all you fall back to is the basic "this is evil". * TCP based connections bad, even DB connections. * EVAPI: Magic cure-all, despite being inherently more complex to implement on the far end, and complexity usually results in more failures. Since this is now being promoted in this thread, can you provide sunlight as to why this is golden vs something DB driven for example? Kaufman Senior Voice Engineer E: bkaufman(a)bcmone.com SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810 | SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510 | Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768 [img]<https://www.sip.us/> [img]<https://www.siptrunk.com/> [img]<https://www.flowroute.com/> ________________________________ From: Alex Balashov via sr-users &lt;sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; Sent: Monday, December 23, 2024 8:16 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List &lt;sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; Cc: Alex Balashov &lt;abalashov(a)evaristesys.com&gt; Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Oh yes. This is the way. -- Alex Balashov Principal Consultant Evariste Systems LLC Web: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fevaristes… Tel: +1-706-510-6800 __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!