7 Nov
2005
7 Nov
'05
11:45 a.m.
On 11/04/05 17:33, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Your comments seem circular. You say:
there is no avp with id integer 500 (defined by the avp alias callscope),
Then you say:
So, there must be a value for the avp i:500
Maybe the phrases were confusing. There
must be an avp which has the
name (id) 500 (integer 500), and this avp must have a value. There is no
such.
And the avp_print even shows the alias "callscope" is actually
populated. Am I missing something?
The avp_print() shows that there is an avp with
the name (id) "callscope".
See: http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/0.9.0/
There is a difference between the name (id) and the alias of an avp.
BTW, I know there are plenty of times when AVPs are useful without
user auth.. but this seems like an important requirement for providing
authenticated services (if you authenticate, you can do this).
I wanted to point
out that loading only upon authentication is not enough.
Daniel
-Brett