Re: [SR-Users] Routing issues with SIP Route headers.

Am 06.09.2010 11:00, schrieb Olle E. Johansson:

Route sets and REGISTER doesn't work well together. From RFC3261 section 10.3: "Registrars MUST ignore the Record-Route header field if it is included in a REGISTER request. Registrars MUST NOT include a Record-Route header field in any response to a REGISTER request. A registrar might receive a request that traversed a proxy which treats REGISTER as an unknown request and which added a Record-Route header field value."

Doesn't say much about pre-loaded route sets. What would be the case here?

AFAIK pre-loaded route sets are fine with REGISTER. It is just the "bug" that Record-Route is not allowed. Therefore they invented the Path header the fix this "bug".

regards Klaus