RE: [Serusers] How can I distinguish 487 and 603 reply?

Hi I have the same problem, please take a look into this report: http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-August/010930.html ...if the called-user belongs to the voicemail group and the caller-user cancels the call I see irregular behavior in both ser instances and no Sip-Response-Code=487 is recorded in radius acc (just an start record without stop). I´ve just tried with "t_check_status" but I have the same problem... please send us some advice... thank you Rafael ser.cfg:: # does the user wish redirection on no availability? (i.e., is he # in the voicemail group?) -- determine it now and store it in # flag 4, before we rewrite the flag using UsrLoc if (is_user_in("Request-URI", "voicemail")) { setflag(4); }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { # handle user which was not found route(4); break; }; # if user is on-line and is in voicemail group, enable redirection if (method == "INVITE" && isflagset(4)) { t_on_failure("1"); }; t_relay(); } # ------------- handling of unavailable user ------------------ route[4] { # non-Voip -- just send "off-line" if (!(method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK" || method=="CANCEL" || method=="BYE")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); acc_rad_request("404 Not Found"); break; }; # not voicemail subscriber if (!isflagset(4)) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found and no voicemail turned on"); acc_rad_request("404 Not Found"); break; }; # forward to voicemail now rewritehostport("call.millicom.com.pe:5090"); t_relay_to_udp("call.millicom.com.pe", "5090"); } # if forwarding downstream did not succeed, try voicemail running # at bat.iptel.org:5090 failure_route[1]{ if (t_check_status("408|486|487")){ revert_uri (); rewritehostport ("call.millicom.com.pe:5090"); append_branch(); t_relay(); break; } } Richard <richard(a)o-matrix.org> wrote: You can use t_check_status("487") to check the code in failure_route[1]. Richard -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Zhang Wei Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 8:30 PM To: Jan Janak Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] How can I distinguish 487 and 603 reply? hello,Jan I meet some trouble when I use SER .I hope that when the call timeouts or is declined by the callee the call would be forward to SEMS. In my ser.cfg ,I wrote : if (method=="INVITE") { t_on_failure("1"); } But when the caller cancels the call,487 reply the callee sends aslo make INVITE enter the failure_route. I don't export it. So how can I distinguish 487 and 603 ? Thanks for your help Wei _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo. Visíta Yahoo! Noticias.