2 Jul
2018
2 Jul
'18
4:59 p.m.
That was my point also...
But they sent me lint to rfc3261 12.1.2 and that confused me
So just for resume:
So am I right if I say that in case If provider receives INVITE with
Record-Route from my side (myProxy)
Provider should care about it's own Record-Route and it should have uri
where myProxy should sent ACK to instead of using Contact in thi case
In case direct conntect UAC -> Provider I still need to use Contact field
as URI to send ACK to that explained on the 12.1.2 of rfc3261?
2018-07-02 9:46 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:31:02AM +0300, Yuriy
Gorlichenko wrote:
But here provider says me - you should use
Contact field to reach target
even from myProxy.
Not if they added another Record-Route hop of theirs.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users