On 11/20/10 10:27 AM, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) wrote:
El Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:15:27 +0100 Daniel-Constantin Mierlamiconda@gmail.com escribió:
This should not be that complex, there is no function name that has '.' in order to have current conflicts to solve. My concern is related to modules with very long names, but seems that most of such cases do not export lot of functions (e.g., presence_*).
Alternative is to introduce a short id for modules, eg,:
ps => presence rp => rtpproxy
Both of them could be used. One short version for expert people and the long, full format for newbies or in didactical examples.
On a second thought, just module name should be enough, because will still be the current version for "experts", at least several releases from now on.
Introducing short alias will just complicate things, adding confusion. In the future we can review the concept and added if many people want it.
Also, we encourage people to find nice short names from beginning of development :-) when only the module name can be used.
Cheers, Daniel