I tend to not agree with some of what people are saying here. We have
deployed a Kamailio/Asterisk platform with GREAT success. Although, I
have the luxury of having many asterisk servers to achieve a common
goal. I have found asterisk to be VERY stable, I am running 1.4.23.
The FastAGI and AMI features of asterisk make it VERY easy to build
highly complex and robust applications which sit one level removed
from the media processor. We generally process hundreds of thousands
of calls each day, with our heaviest day on record reaching well over
3 million calls in an 18 hour period... all this with a
Kamailio/Asterisk stack.
I think it all depends on the goals and requirements of a particular
project, but I can say with full confidence that I would choose the
same path if given the opportunity to do it all over again.
Just my $0.02
:)
2009/3/17 Tristan <tristan(a)telemaque.fr>fr>:
Hi,
replace asterisk with freeswitch or any other b2bua that scales a little
better will certainly avoid future troubles
(experience speaking ;p )
Regards,
Gled
Iñaki Baz Castillo a écrit :
2009/3/17 Juan Perez <jperezsip2008(a)yahoo.com>om>:
thank you very much guys, your comments are highly appreciated,
unfortunately it is not up to me to decide the media gw to use.
The fact is that in this thread Asterisk is being recommended exactly
for that "media gw".
Having Asterisk as intelligent B2BUA for logic application will become
a problem for sure. It's not well designed for that.
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users