Re: [SR-Users] dialog:end event route

Yes, sorry, `dialog:failed` exactly. Issue I found is quite strange. Schema of testing is A calling B through Kamailio. B is not answering, jut keep sending 180. On dialog:failed I have this code: event_route[dialog:failed] { xlog("L_ALERT", '[DIALOG:FAILED] "req":"$rm", "cs":"$cs", "dst":"$du", "from":"$fU", "to":"$tU", "cid":"$ci", "si":"$si", "sp":"$sp", "kts":$TV(Sn)' + "\n"); } Quite simple. But when actual dialog failed on fr_inv_timer excite, in logs I have ALERT: <script>: [DIALOG:FAILED] "req":"OPTIONS", "cs":"1", "dst":"<null>", "from":"you", "to":"you", "cid":"123", "si":"1.0.0.127", "sp":"5060", "kts":1560329373.947588 And I can't get which dialog failed exactly. But on the other hand, I can catch it on failure_route on t_branch_timeout() That was a question actually. Cause on call reject (with 5xx or 6xx) or similar I have correct dialog:failed event. Regards, Igor On Jun 11, 2019, 13:23 +0300, Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt;om>, wrote: > Hello, > > On 10.06.19 13:35, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Just to confirm, is event route [dialog:end] not called on > > fr_inv_timer expiry? > > Cause it's called on call busy (486) and reject (whatever 6xx). So, > > what's the idea of not calling it on timeout? Or I'm missing something? > > > > Kamailio 5.2 > > if the INVITE does not get 200ok, then another event route is executed: > >   - > https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dialog.html#idm1039307… > > Cheers, > Daniel > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com > www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >