Re: [Serusers] DNS SRV sending call to second priority

indeed -- that's currently an unsupported feature being worked on.

-jiri

At 17:46 05/06/2006, Paul Antinori (pantinor) wrote:

Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C688B7.3390EF42"

I am using DNS SRV query for stateful routing of calls like in my script below. I see the SRV query is going through from SER.

My problem is that when the call times out to priority 1 A record, SER does not send it to priority 2.

Thanks for help.

vxml-1 IN A 10.86.xxx.1 vxml-2 IN A 10.86.xxx.2 vxml-3 IN A 10.86.xxx.3

; Priority Weight Port Target _sip._tcp.vxml.pats.cisco.com. SRV 1 1 5060 vxml-1.pats.cisco.com. SRV 2 1 5060 vxml-2.pats.cisco.com. SRV 3 1 5060 vxml-3.pats.cisco.com. _sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com. SRV 1 1 5060 vxml-1.pats.cisco.com. SRV 2 1 5060 vxml-2.pats.cisco.com. SRV 3 1 5060 vxml-3.pats.cisco.com.

route{

   if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { 
           sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); 
           break; 
   }; 

   if (uri=~"^sip:7") { 
           log(1, "Found 7*\n"); 
           rewritehostport("vxml.pats.cisco.com"); 
           route(1); 
           break; 
   } 

   if (uri=~"^sip:9") { 
           log(1, "Found 9*\n"); 
           rewritehostport("ringtone.pats.cisco.com"); 
           route(1); 
           break; 
   } 

   log(1,"Could Not Match DN to a Route\n"); 

   route(1); 

}

route[1] {

   #use "t_relay" for STATEFUL forwarding 
   #for STATELESS forwarding use this syntax: forward(10.86.xx.xx,5060); 

   if (!t_relay()) { 
           sl_reply_error(); 
   }; 

} _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/