17 Feb
2016
17 Feb
'16
3:30 p.m.
Just a quick question, if possible.
I can’t get $ru in reply, cause in reply_route it gives me $ru from
original INVITE. In OpenSIPS I’m using $(<reply>hdr(contact)), but how to
do this on Kamailio?
Anyway, contact Header from reply was got from tcpdump capture on Kamailio
server.
2016-02-17 10:06 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
isn't the username then decoded from the value of
sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**
In other words, when the follow up invite in Kamailio comes, can you print
the value of $ru with xlog and see if it has username?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/02/16 22:54, Igor Olhovskiy wrote:
Yep, got same problem.
Not sure it’s a bug, but seems to be topoh module is really lack some
configuration.
2016-02-12 21:13 GMT+02:00 SamyGo <govoiper(a)gmail.com>om>:
--
Best regards,
Igor
Hi All,
I've recently stumbled upon this little hitch while using kamailio with
topoh module that the Contact header do not contains the User part for the
302 Moved temporarily packet.
*My topology:*
UserA<====\
->Kamailio<===>FreeSwitch
UserB<====/
The B party has set Call forwarding on their phone hence phone sends a
302 Moved Temporarily to Kamailio.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0767.4e4e57deca89da5c5f5ae97228325f85.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;branch=z9hG4bKsr-j4IPOlV7MGQKatycM.y7MGZLMGZwM.1LgRWIC9gIgx4fMGZAOBVAOBNfzuaVHRaYpB1LNSQLpx4uMx3Az6eL3RsBCxu-zRrUWSeOgjeBk.IVm4ds34aONc**
From: "+4319714111" <sip:+4319714111
@FREESWITCH.IP.HERE>;tag=yUr5UZ7eF794K
To: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;tag=105223296
Call-ID: cd811276-4b4d-1234-66ae-005056867dbc
CSeq: 87257355 INVITE
Contact: <sip:06606017597@FREESWITCH.IP.HERE:5060>
User-Agent: Yealink SIP-T46G 28.80.0.70
Diversion: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;reason=unconditional
Content-Length: 0
This is modified in Kamailio TOPOH and sent to FreeSwitch as following
SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.0.20.71;received=10.0.20.71;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKeBcy9HKK9cDKr
From: "+4319714111" <sip:+4319714111
@FREESWITCH.IP.HERE>;tag=yUr5UZ7eF794K
To: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;tag=105223296
Call-ID: cd811276-4b4d-1234-66ae-005056867dbc
CSeq: 87257355 INVITE
Contact: <*sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP*
;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**>
User-Agent: Yealink SIP-T46G 28.80.0.70
Diversion: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;reason=unconditional
Content-Length: 0
Which results in a Call Originate from FreeSwitch with RURI as this:
INVITE
*sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP*;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**
SIP/2.0
I am thinking that in TOPOH Module some patch is required to atleast
retain the $rU for 3XX replies , not sure if this will break some RFC or
Kamailio stability etc !
Thanks,
Sammy.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Best regards,
Igor
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.comhttp://miconda.eu
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users