4 Mar
2011
4 Mar
'11
6:42 p.m.
On Friday 04 March 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 04.03.2011 16:07, schrieb marius zbihlei:
I think so.
Hello,
i like the discussed way without the additional parameter more, if it not
interfere with possible other implementations which also maybe works the same
way.
Cheers
Henning
What do
you think?
Replying to myself..
Of course, this is almost the same as your idea, the question would this
suffice, of a param to loose_route will be needed to enable/disable this
behavior ?!