Hi Henning,
yes as soon as I solve it I will try to give you a config and a sipp
script that shows you the issue. It seems its in the function
build_req_buf_from_sip_req (modules/tm/msg_translator.c) that if you
have a flag in the message that says FL_TCP_MTU_FB and your message is
larger than a given MTU for UDP that you can define in the core config
it will change you to TCP even if you have used t_relay_to_udp so I am
trying to find out why my message has that flag and what's the value of
that MTU parameter etc.
I just explain it here so that in the future someone else has the
problem kamilio all of a sudden deciding TCP when it should have been
UDP, maybe its because of this flag, config parameter and crazy behavior
(if I would have used t_relay maybe not so crazy but I used
t_relay_to_udp explicitly... so quite crazy that instead of returning an
error or something it tries TCP).
Best regards
alberto
El 08/03/2024 a las 11:38, Henning Westerholt escribió:
Hello,
this sound indeed strange, as this is used from many people without any problems. Its not
expected to use C programming to alter the message transport for relaying.
If you can reproduce and minimize the problem towards a small test cfg and a test
message, it would be great if you could open an issue in our tracker.
Cheers,
Henning
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alberto Diez via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
> Sent: Freitag, 8. März 2024 10:28
> To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> Cc: Alberto Diez <alberto-lists(a)mobileplots.com>
> Subject: [SR-Users] Re: from TCP to UDP and Kamailio doing it wrong
>
> thanks Alex. Sadly in my case the Request-URI does not contain a transport
> parameter.
>
> So the call to prepare_new_uac() function is deciding based on another
> parameter (don't know which, was trying to avoid investigating that because
> the function is a pain and not commented). I think its quite counter-intuitive,
> and for me a bug, that you call t_relay_to_udp and Kamailio tries to connect
> over TCP.... Same if its dispatcher module asking to dispatch to UDP and
> t_relay decides TCP (because it calls this same function at the end) etc.
>
> By the way I also tried forcing the socket from the config file to be the UDP
> one, and nothing. Prior to calling prepare_new_uac the socket is the UDP one,
> but after calling that function it has changed the socket to a TCP one.
>
> Would be great if anyone has a hint what could be going on and why
> prepare_new_uac changes the socket and based on what param
>
> Best regards
>
> alberto
>
> El 07/03/2024 a las 21:44, Alex Balashov via sr-users escribió:
>> If you just strip the incoming ;transport=tcp attribute, I think all should be
> well when t_relay() consumes the modified RURI.
>>> On 7 Mar 2024, at 12:48, Alberto Diez via sr-users <sr-
> users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Sergiu,
>>> yes I am pretty sure something is going wrong.
>>> I do have kamailio listening udp sockets and also the dispatcher is on UDP
> doing SIP OPTIONS over UDP all the time without any problem.
>>> I have not tried forcing the socket I tried to find out why kamailio is
trying to
> use TCP with the targets even when I use t_relay_to_udp and that's how I
> ended up finding that function which claims not to do something if next_hop
> is 0 but doing it nevertheless (which I guess is something going wrong in
> general in Kamailio not in particular in my setup).
>>> I will try forcing the socket, but that crazy tm module function
>>> rewrites the socket was already given as a destination (yes I already
>>> checked that in the C code before!) Best regards alberto El
>>> 07/03/2024 a las 17:43, Sergiu Pojoga escribió:
>>>> You must be doing something essentially wrong if it came down to
> checking C functions for something as trivial as transport conversion..
>>>> Are you sure you have a UDP listening socket?
>>>> kamcmd corex.list_sockets
>>>>
>>>> Result of:
>>>> kamcmd dispatcher.list
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried forcing the send socket?
>>>>
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/pseudovariables#fs_-_f
>>>> orced_send_socket
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 11:27 AM Alberto Diez via sr-users <sr-
> users(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi kamailio community,
>>>>
>>>> I have an issue with a Kamailio 5.7. It's listening both in TCP and
>>>> UDP. In my scenario requests arrive from devices on TCP, but I want
>>>> to forward to the next hops on UDP. I am avoiding using any type of
>>>> DNS resolution; since I am always forwarding to predefined next hops
>>>> I am using the dispatcher module (defined with the IP addresses and
>>>> transport=udp) or I wrote config files using t_relay_to_udp or
>>>> t_relay_to with a udp: followed by IP address. I never set up FQDNS
>>>> only IP addresses and in all of them I explicitly mention UDP.
>>>>
>>>> In all of these scenarios I have tried Kamailio insists in trying to
>>>> use TCP with the next hop and failing because the next_hop is only
>>>> UDP. I guess because the message arrived using TCP Kamilio does that
>>>> but I find the behavior very confusing.
>>>>
>>>> I nailed down that in my situation its the tm module function
>>>> prepare_new_uac (in file src/modules/tm/t_fwd.c line 119) being the
>>>> one that missbehaves. The documentation of the function says literraly
:
>>>>
>>>> "* t->uac[branch].request.dst will be filled if next_hop !=0 with
the result
>>>> * of the DNS resolution (next_hop, fproto and fsocket).
>>>> * If next_hop is 0 all the dst members except the send_flags are
read-
> only
>>>> * (send_flags it's updated) and are supposed to be
pre-filled."
>>>>
>>>> I found out that even when next_hop is 0 the function changes the
>>>> t->uac[branch].request.dst proto, socket etc. its there that the
>>>> kamailio takes the wrong decision, until that function is called
>>>> within add_auc, the destination proto or the fproto etc is always 1
>>>> (UDP) which is what I am trying to force from the config file or the
>>>> dispatcher definition (I tried both ways). But after calling that
>>>> function then it comes as a 2 (TCP)
>>>>
>>>> The problematic function is a monster of 500 lines and I would like
>>>> to avoid having to understand it. Since I think the scenario is not
>>>> so unusual I just want to ask if maybe I am missing something that I
>>>> should do to avoid the Kamailio to select TCP and in order to have
>>>> the tm module respecting my preference for UDP (either with
>>>> dispatcher module and the transport param or with t_relay_to or
>>>> t_relay_to_udp I don't care the way).
>>>>
>>>> Any hints are welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> alberto
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________
>>>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To
>>>> unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
the
> sender!
>>>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>>> __________________________________________________________
>>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To
>>> unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
the
> sender!
>>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe
> send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: