The debate from my point of view was the _architecture of the protocols_: sip vs msrp -- read it to some extent like: structure of the messages. You go very much to specifics on existing sip for voice -- like it is unimaginable to have some requests (for content of communication) within a dialog following different path than INVITE and BYE (or the requests that control the session) when it is more optimal.
I provided just leads to similar mechanisms, not the specs of how it must be done. It is nothing I should argument, what you summarized it is what you extracted/understood, but it is not what I meant it must be.
Cheers, Daniel
On 5/27/11 10:41 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2011/5/27 Daniel-Constantin Mierlamiconda@gmail.com:
I wonder if you really read to understand or just spot 'single concepts' to make them out of the context in order to reply something. That is endless and topic breaker.
Hi Daniel, that is not my aim.