Can you get a ngrep trace captured on kamailio server for such situation?
Also, can you paste the failure_route block here along with the log messages from the syslog?
Cheers, Daniel
On 07.07.17 12:42, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
I think serial because the new branch is only created in case the first is timeout.
*De :*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com] *Envoyé :* vendredi 7 juillet 2017 12:40 *À :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org; Nicolas Breuer Nicolas.Breuer@belcenter.biz *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] TR: Failure Mode
Hello,
are you doing parallel forking or serial forking?
Cheers, Daniel
On 07.07.17 12:24, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
* * Hello, Some help here is needed # auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3) I test a call with two branches. 1^st branch received a 408 timeout error 2nd branch received a 486 busy. Normally the failure route should be with the 486. NOTICE: <script>: Failure route -----2---1--408---- We can see the 408 is the winning reply but I understood from the documentation that if Failure reply mode is “3” , the winning reply is always the reply from the last branch J It’s a problem because if the 1^st is timeout (because down), the second is OK but callee is busy ; we don’t send the right reply to the caller _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda http://www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com http://www.kamailioworld.com