Jiri Kuthan wrote:
At 23:48 21/11/2006, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I would propose to have focus on making own applications better than trying to show the other one is worse.
Hi Daniel,
I actually think that providing undisputable measurements is a good thing to do for knowledge. Knowledge is never too dear :-) (Sir Welsingham) Something is rotten in the state of Denmark (W.S.), though....
What surprises me is that with this strong opinion of yours, your own company actually displays comparisons with outdated software on its website: http://www.openser.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=44
Openser users know that this is an rather old comparison. Nevertheless, to avoid confusing newbies I would suggest adding a timestamp of the comparison and detailed version information.
There is another webpage which really makes me puzzled. It is called "OpenSER History" http://openser.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&.... The owner of the website, Voice Sistem SRL, which I believe you are affiliated with, suggests in a twisted language that SER has been purposely discontinued.
Apperently Ottendorf proves this to be wrong. Although I ever wondered if there will come a new ser release (no roadmap). This site needs an update ...
I'm being told that some other personal affiliated with the same company more or less copied-n-pasted TCP code from the allegibly discontinued SER to OpenSER.
That's how open source works. I also copied lots of TLS extensions from ser to openser, and even extended it. You can also copy my extensions back to ser ... I would love to see it there :-)
regards Klaus
So can you confirm for me that Voice Sistem SRL takes NEW code from SER of it which it says it is NOT being continued on its webpage?
This is really not a most pleasant conversation I can think of, but I am really *very* interested in your answers.
-jiri
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers