30 Jan
2004
30 Jan
'04
8:14 p.m.
Hello Jamin,
yes, the change is easy, but I haven't commited yet because I have to test it
with Cisco gear first (there were some problems previously -- loops) and it
takes some time. I can send you a patch if you want to give it a try by
yourself.
Jan.
On 30-01 11:18, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 06:54:05PM +0100, Jan Janak
wrote:
On 11-01 23:24, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
Any progress on this?
--
Jamin W. Collins
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. --Aldous Huxley,
"Proper Studies", 1927
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:40:35PM +0100, Jan
Janak wrote:
I will send you a notification.
It's a bug in ser which was introduced when we wanted to make ser more
interoperable with implementations that remove unknown parameters from
Record-Route header fields. I will revert the changes and that will
eliminate the problem with Snom.
Thank you very much. Will there be a notice of a patch or new version?