12 Nov
2007
12 Nov
'07
2:20 p.m.
Ok, thanks for your answer, I understand your position.
Anyway I cannot understand why SER modify the Contact header without any instruction about
that in the config file...is there any reason concerning RFC compliance?
Best regards,
Stefano
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.09
A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] Loadbalancing for interco
Well, load-balancing is not easy. To deal with issues like you are
describing,
your best choice is a load-balancer which is capable of working in
transparent
mode. We have such in our intelligence, some work, some less so, let me
know
if you need some intelligence on this.
-jiri
At 12:23 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8251E.664EA61A"
Hi,
we are trying to do the same with our servers but we have some problem
with
registrations:
it seem that when the REGISTER message pass
through SER, the host-part of
Contact field is modified with the local address of
SER.
Is it a misconfiguration problem?
Do you have experience in balancing also the registrations?
Thanks,
Stefano
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote:
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ Hi all,
Is there a way to have something like a
loadbalancing on SER for
outgoing calls ?
I want to distribute the calls between two
gateways. Ideally, with a
coefficient (ie. 60% for the first and 40% for
the second).
Thanks for your support.
Adrien .L
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers