This is just the on_reply part of the ser config file to handle
replies behind NAT. Obviously you have to check in the route[x] wether
the calling UA is behind NAT and apply the appropriate
mediaproxy|rtpproxy.
Samuel
2006/5/8, O. <ozaarur(a)gmail.com>om>:
thanks, so we have to keep the proxy.
In this case when one of the client will be behind nat does the proxy
will transfer the RTP? or still the the RTP will be route without proxy
involved?
Thanks,
O.
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 23:57 +0200, Ladislav Andel wrote:
Hi O.,
This will work only with one NAT involved in SIP dialog. If you have
both clients behind NAT then RTPproxy or Mediaproxy is necessary. Also,
your clients has to support active/passive direction attribute and be
able to read source IP:port address from the first RTP packet received.
Regards,
Ladislav
O. wrote:
Hi Kostas and samuel,
In the case you are describing, using nathelper will replace the
rtpproxy or medianproxy? It looks to me that in this case the rtp will
be route in between the sip client, without any proxy. In the
configuration you mentioned the ser is on public IP?
if this is the case it looks much better the proxy from the load
prospective.
thanks,
O.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers