28 Aug
2012
28 Aug
'12
8:56 a.m.
28 aug 2012 kl. 12:31 skrev "Konstantin M." <evilzluk(a)gmail.com>om>:
That's weird.
I've been using OpenVZ in productions sites handling 1500 concurrent calls without any
issues. For years.
I guess it's a matter of personal preferences. Good to hear that you have it working
in Xen!
/O
From my
previous experience, I can't say, it's a correct.
I'm using asterisk
(over 3 years) and kamailio (about 1 year) in a *production* environment using Xen and I
have almost no problems with timers (they were previously with 100Hz),
but I have experienced A LOT of problems with asterisk or any voip-related projects using
OpenVZ.
So from my own perspective, OpenVZ (which is a more cheaper) is only suitable for hosting
(web or such of tasks) or any non-realtime tasks.
Maybe it was caused by incorrect settings on host (which was out of my control).
Maybe I'm wrong but to me, Xen is better vs OpenVZ :-)
2012/8/28 Olle E. Johansson <oej(a)edvina.net>
I haven't heard anyone using Asterisk in large production systems in other
virtualization than OpenVZ. Asterisk depends a lot on timers and these aren't reliable
enough in Vmware and Xen when putting load on the media server.
I would love to hear about a successful implementation :-) on other platforms but so far
I haven't. While waiting, OpenVZ works great.
/O
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users