27 Feb
2015
27 Feb
'15
3:59 a.m.
On 27 Feb 2015, at 09:53, Sebastian Damm <damm(a)sipgate.de> wrote:
Actually, it's the latter. Our current high
availability setup reilies on anycast. And with TCP, this would mean a huge change in our
setup.
That is in fact an interesting topic. Can you please elaborate a bit more on this
as I would like to see what we can
do in the software to make things easier.
I had a similar discussion a while ago and it seems like failover handling is easier in
UDP and we will need to fix this in order to be able to migrate more users to TLS.
I haven't tested how different clients behave in regards of TCP if the server close a
connection.
/O