Hi Alexandre,
i don't have a clue, what is going wrong there. The timeout socket,
you provide, must not necessarily point to the Kamailio-XML-RPC-Port,
in my test-cases it just pointed anywhere... (i hope it does not mess
up the XML-RPC Process of Kamailio if you connect there and do
nothing).
I am a little short in time at the moment, so i have just tar'ed the
local RTP-Proxy i used for the development, so maybe you can test it,
If it works with my version of RTP-Proxy, i will have to check why....
Carsten
2011/3/16 Alexandre Abreu <alexandre.abreu(a)redt.com.br>br>:
Hello Carsten,
If you use "-n tcp:127.0.0.1" without port you get:
[root@devel ~]# rtpproxy -T 10 -F -i -l 192.168.200.90 -s udp:127.0.0.1 7722
-n tcp:127.0.0.1 -d DBUG
rtpproxy: can't parse host:port in TCP address
rtpproxy: can't start notification thread
As I wrote in my previous mail, I am using "-n tcp:192.168.200.90:8000"
which points to the address that XMLRPC server is listening to.
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8000 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 3661/kamailio
What I am missing here?
Thanks,
Alexandre.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: kaiserbock2(a)googlemail.com [mailto:kaiserbock2@googlemail.com] Em nome
de Carsten Bock
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de março de 2011 09:00
Para: Alexandre Abreu
Cc: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
Assunto: Re: RTPPROXY timeout patch.
Hi,
Sorry for confusion:
You will have to define a Timeout socket, when starting RTP-Proxy (-n,
may be invalid):
bock@bock-tde:~/ims/sr-rtpp/sip-router/modules/rtpproxy/test$ cat
./exec_rtpproxy.txt
./rtpproxy -T 10 -f -F -i -l 127.0.0.1 -s udp:*:22222 -d DBUG -n
tcp:127.0.0.1
Recent Versions of RTP-Proxy start a separate thread to process the
timeouts; but only if the timeout socket is defined at startup.
Then it should work.
Good luck,
Carsten
P.S.: I will add some docs on howto make this work in the next days to
GIT-Trunk.
2011/3/15 Alexandre Abreu <alexandre.abreu(a)redt.com.br>br>:
Hello Carsten.
Still no lucky. I just moved the whole rtpproxy/ directory into 3.1 branch
and recompiled and then changed my script to use
rtpproxy_offer()/rtpproxy_answer().
Look:
Mar 15 14:04:38 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:handle_command: new session
e2361a59b4588d51, tag ed382a18;1 requested, type strong
Mar 15 14:04:38 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:handle_command: new session on
a
port 44206 created, tag ed382a18;1
Mar 15 14:04:38 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:handle_command: pre-filling
caller's address with 192.168.200.114:6380
Mar 15 14:04:39 devel kamailio[29544]: NOTICE: acc [acc.c:275]: ACC:
transaction answered:
timestamp=1300208679;method=INVITE;from_tag=ed382a18;to_tag=19477c42;call_id
=e2361a59b4588d51;code=200;reason=OK;
Mar 15 14:04:39 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:handle_command: lookup on
ports
44206/41680, session timer restarted
Mar 15 14:04:39 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:handle_command: setting custom
timeout handler (xmlrpc:http://localhost:8000/RPC2)
Mar 15 14:04:39 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:handle_command: pre-filling
callee's address with 192.168.200.149:9494
Mar 15 14:04:50 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:process_rtp: session timeout
Mar 15 14:04:50 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:remove_session: RTP stats: 963
in from callee, 10 in from caller, 973 relayed, 0 dropped
Mar 15 14:04:50 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:remove_session: RTCP stats: 5
in
from callee, 1 in from caller, 6 relayed, 0
dropped
Mar 15 14:04:50 devel rtpproxy[29111]: INFO:remove_session: session on
ports
44206/41680 is cleaned up
Started with:
rtpproxy -T 10 -F -i -l 192.168.200.90 -s udp:127.0.0.1:7722 -n
tcp:192.168.200.90:8000 -d DBUG
SIP-ROUTER config:
# ----- rtpproxy params -----
modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock",
"udp:localhost:7722")
modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_tout", 3)
modparam("rtpproxy", "timeout_socket",
"xmlrpc:http://localhost:8000/RPC2")
# The Port for incoming XML-RPC requests
modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "port", 8000)
modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "reply_option", 1)
modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "buffer_size", 8192)
modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "log_file", "/tmp/openser_xmlrpc")
The session keeps active after the RTPPROXY proxy timeout. It seems
dlg_terminate_dlg isn't being triggered. Am I missing something else
beyond
moving rtpproxy/ directory?
As this thread is a user-question, I am copying SR-USERS mail list. I am
also using xmlrpc-c-1.06.41.
Thanks,
Alexandre.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: kaiserbock2(a)googlemail.com [mailto:kaiserbock2@googlemail.com] Em nome
de Carsten Bock
Enviada em: terça-feira, 15 de março de 2011 05:15
Para: Alexandre Abreu
Assunto: Re: RTPPROXY timeout patch.
Hi Alexandre,
sorry, yes, your correct. My changes are not in the 3.1 branch, but only
GIT-Master. Only the GIT-Master currently holds the correct patch and
config.
I will need to backport the changes from the master... (will do so this
week).
Carsten
2011/3/14 Alexandre Abreu <alexandre.abreu(a)redt.com.br>br>:
Hello Carsten,
Let me ask you a question:
If "First is important to clarify: from version 3.0.0 on, Kamailio and
SER are identical in terms of source code.", then why your changes
does not reflect in kamailio 3.1 from GIT?
I did see the changes by getting the SIP-ROUTER from GIT. Kamailio 3.1
from GIT does not have your code.
Thanks.
Alexandre
-----Mensagem original-----
De: kaiserbock2(a)googlemail.com [mailto:kaiserbock2@googlemail.com] Em
nome de Carsten Bock Enviada em: segunda-feira, 14 de março de 2011
05:31
Para: Alexandre Abreu
Cc: RTPproxy Development
Assunto: Re: RTPPROXY timeout patch.
Hello,
i hope, you had a nice weekend... ;-)
Are you sure, you are using the GIT-Version of the
Kamailio/sip-router.org config?
In the GIT version it is now:
modparam("rtpproxy", "timeout_socket",
"xmlrpc:http://localhost:8000/RPC2")
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=mod
ules/r
tpproxy/test/kamailio.cfg;h=0d5c73ff2065f33f262981fba2c07e65496e7415;h
b=HEAD
This should work (as tested by me).
Carsten
2011/3/11 Alexandre Abreu <alexandre.abreu(a)redt.com.br>br>:
> Hello Carsten,
>
> The patch was applied just fine but I can't get that feature working.
> See
> below:
>
> [root@devel log]# rtpproxy -v
> Basic version: 20040107
> Extension 20050322: Support for multiple RTP streams and MOH
> Extension
> 20060704: Support for extra parameter in the V command Extension
> 20071116: Support for RTP re-packetization Extension 20071218:
> Support for forking (copying) RTP stream Extension 20080403: Support
> for RTP statistics querying Extension 20081102: Support for setting
> codecs in the update/lookup command Extension 20081224: Support for
> session timeout notifications Extension 20090810: Support for
> automatic bridging Extension 20100819: Support for timeout
> notifications using XML-RPC towards
Kamailio/sip-router.org
>
> Using SR 3.1.2, my configuration file was exactly the same as the
> example in test/ subdirectory you commit to rtpproxy module.
>
> # RTP-Proxy
> modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock",
"udp:localhost:22222")
> modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_tout", 3)
modparam("rtpproxy",
> "timeout_socket", "http://localhost:8000/RPC2")
>
> # The Port for incoming XML-RPC requests modparam("mi_xmlrpc",
> "port",
> 8000) modparam("mi_xmlrpc", "reply_option", 1)
modparam("mi_xmlrpc",
> "buffer_size", 8192) modparam("mi_xmlrpc",
"log_file",
> "/tmp/openser_xmlrpc")
>
> Still inside test/ subdir we have the following example:
>
> [root@devel test]# cat exec_rtpproxy.txt ./rtpproxy -T 10 -f -F -i -l
> <your IP> -s udp:*:22222 -d DBUG
>
> You mean that if XML-RPC is used, it has to begin with "xmlrpc:". I
> can't see this string anywhere in these examples. I guess these files
> are not up to date. Am I correct?
> I can see the session timeout in RTPPROXY, but the session does not
close.
If I
understand right how this feature works, it should send a
"dlg_terminate_dlg + call-id" to send the BYE to both sides.
Any tip on what could be wrong?
Thanks,
Alexandre
-----Mensagem original-----
De: kaiserbock2(a)googlemail.com [mailto:kaiserbock2@googlemail.com] Em
nome de Carsten Bock Enviada em: quinta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de
2011
20:53
Para: Alexandre Abreu
Cc: RTPproxy Development
Assunto: Re: RTPPROXY timeout patch.
Hi Alexandre,
i updated the patch in the sip-router-repository (and attached the
patch to this email). The new patch and the modifications to the
rtpproxy module need some more testing, i have only done basic
functionality
testing so far.
I have reduced the patch a little, the socket, if
the
XML-RPC-Interface is used, has to begin with "xmlrpc:". This way, the
protocol of the RTP-Proxy stays intact.
If you have spare-time, please test it; otherwise, i will do it asap
(but i am travelling a lot next week).
@Maxim: This new version of the patch is much better, than the old one.
Maybe you can review this one? Thanks!
Carsten
2011/2/10 Carsten Bock <lists(a)bock.info>fo>:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> the current GIT-version contains some more modifications regarding
> timeout sockets.
> That is the reason why the patch does not work anymore.
> I will need to review the code and adapt my patch accordingly.
> I will do so later.
>
> Carsten
>
> 2011/2/2 Alexandre Abreu <alexandre.abreu(a)redt.com.br>br>:
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> The stable version of RTPProxy is indeed 1.2.1. In this version,
>> there is no file 'rtpp_notify.c' so I think the patch is really
>> for git-version. Maybe the original patch was made regarding to an
>> earlier
git commit.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexandre
>>
>> -----Mensagem original-----
>> De: kaiserbock2(a)googlemail.com [mailto:kaiserbock2@googlemail.com]
>> Em nome de Carsten Bock Enviada em: quarta-feira, 2 de fevereiro de
>> 2011
>> 06:02
>> Para: Alexandre Abreu
>> Cc: RTPproxy Development
>> Assunto: Re: RTPPROXY timeout patch.
>>
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> the patch was for the stable version of RTP-Proxy (1.2.1?). I will
>> review the patch for the git-version.
>> I am a little busy at the moment (business travel), so i can first
>> do this on friday or next week.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Carsten
>>
>> P.S.: Please always CC the list.
>>
>> 2011/2/1 Alexandre Abreu <alexandre.abreu(a)redt.com.br>br>:
>>> Hi Carsten,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am testing the new RTPProxy timeout feature in Kamailio (GIT
version).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Got the rtpproxy from GIT:
>>>
>>> git clone
git://sippy.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/sippy/rtpproxy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I applied the patch:
>>>
>>> [root@devel rtpproxy]# patch < rtpproxy.patch
>>>
>>> patching file Makefile.am
>>>
>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 4.
>>>
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.am.rej
>>>
>>> patching file config.h.in
>>>
>>> patching file configure.ac
>>>
>>> patching file rtpp_command.c
>>>
>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 54 (offset 2 lines).
>>>
>>> Hunk #3 succeeded at 272 (offset 2 lines).
>>>
>>> Hunk #4 succeeded at 315 with fuzz 2.
>>>
>>> Hunk #5 FAILED at 466.
>>>
>>> Hunk #6 FAILED at 961.
>>>
>>> 2 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>> rtpp_command.c.rej
>>>
>>> patching file rtpp_notify.c
>>>
>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 38.
>>>
>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 263 (offset 78 lines).
>>>
>>> misordered hunks! output would be garbled
>>>
>>> Hunk #4 FAILED at 250.
>>>
>>> Hunk #5 FAILED at 337.
>>>
>>> 3 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>> rtpp_notify.c.rej
>>>
>>> patching file rtpp_notify.h
>>>
>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 39 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines).
>>>
>>> patching file rtpp_session.c
>>>
>>> patching file rtpp_session.h
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As you see, not so clean but the files were patched.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On CentOS 5, I can’t find the LIBXMLRPC through YUM/RPM, so I
>>> compiled xmlrpc-c-1.06.41.tgz by hand:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ./configure –prefix=/usr && make && make install
>>>
>>> AND ./configure && make && make install
>>>
>>> With that, the headers are both on /usr/lib/include and
>>> /usr/local/lib/include (I did that just to be sure that the config
>>> wasn’t looking at the wrong place).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> xmlrpc_abyss.h
>>>
>>> xmlrpc_cgi.h
>>>
>>> XmlRpcCpp.h
>>>
>>> xmlrpc_server.h
>>>
>>> xmlrpc_client.h
>>>
>>> xmlrpc.h
>>>
>>> xmlrpc_server_w32httpsys.h
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The configure script from patched RTPPROXY doesn’t _try_ to find
>>> the LIBXMLRPC (there’s no reference in config.log) and therefore
>>> my rtpproxy doesn’t have the support for the timeout notification.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any comment on what could be wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carsten Bock
>> Schomburgstr. 80
>> 22767 Hamburg
>> Germany
>>
>> Mobile +49 179 2021244
>> Home +49 40 34927217
>> Büro (Verl) +49 5246 801427
>> Fax +49 40 34927218
>> mailto:carsten@bock.info
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carsten Bock
> Schomburgstr. 80
> 22767 Hamburg
> Germany
>
> Mobile +49 179 2021244
> Home +49 40 34927217
> Büro (Verl) +49 5246 801427
> Fax +49 40 34927218
> mailto:carsten@bock.info
>
--
Carsten Bock
Schomburgstr. 80
22767 Hamburg
Germany
Mobile +49 179 2021244
Home +49 40 34927217
Büro (Verl) +49 5246 801427
Fax +49 40 34927218
mailto:carsten@bock.info
--
Carsten Bock
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
--
Carsten Bock
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
--
Carsten Bock
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com