Carlos Loarca wrote:
Hi Klaus, when I run the command "ngrep -d any" I get
I meant to use the -d any parameter to sniff also on the loopnack interface. You should also have a filter, e.g:
ngrep -d any port 5060
If you do not see any SIP requests with the above command, then there are other problems :-)
regards klaus
olny irrelevant packets like
# T 83.140.44.243:22 -> 83.140.44.242:32965 [AP] ,...............AL. ..xI.b.V...........#.$../.KN.;.......e....".P.5.6.8.... .s.{#.`..R.....U4.......}.A.+.l....92 exit 9313 received, 75 dropped
Is that the command I should use???
Cheers, /Carlos
--- Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at wrote:
To debug this, we would need a complete ngrep trace and ser.cfg (remove sensitive information like passwords)
regards klaus
Carlos Loarca wrote:
Yes Klaus, it seems that it is looping. but the strange behaviour occurs when there is a
missdialled
call and gets the error message from other
equipment
(ie. voip gateway). Otherwise, the ser performance
is
correct.
Any clue?. I have checked my traces and the
repeated
ACK coming from the voip-gateway has the right Via
and
the ACK sent my ser are ok as well. Where can the problem be?
Cheers, /Carlos
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com