23 Oct
2015
23 Oct
'15
5:15 a.m.
Hello,
not that familiar with the dmq code to assert something by hart, but you
can always prevent any incident by capturing the SIP packet inside
config file and reply from there instead of handling it with dmq module
(if(method==...) ).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/10/15 09:49, Sebastian Damm wrote:
Hi,
I did see that REGISTERs received via DMQ are not replicated. What I
was wondering is, whether registrar 1 at some point discovers
registrar 2 through the DMQ pings, and then "automagically" starts
replicating its packets to registrar 2, too.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
iirc, if one node doesn't handle a SIP register itself, should not
publish to other nodes anything. Is this what you are looking for
-- one node not to send to the others?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 20/10/15 17:24, Sebastian Damm wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
Hi,
I evaluated the dmq_usrloc module, and it works pretty good if
there are two identical machines which replicate their location
with each other. But what I actually want to do is to send
registrations to an extra machine which is just there for writing
the location into a central DB (in one table for all the
registrars), from where it can be accessed (by a web page for
example).
So for example, I have three machines, registrar 1 and registrar
2, and receiver. receiver will never interact with customers. It
is just there for writing the location into the database.
I configured both registrars to send their packets to receiver,
and I configured the receiver to send its packets (which it
actually never does) to a dns name containing both registrars.
But after reading the content of some PING messages and reading
something about "autodiscovery" of dmq on the mailing list, I'm
not sure whether my scenario will work the way I want it to.
Can somebody explain whether I can use dmq_usrloc for this
purpose? Or is it only intended to be used for bidirectional
replication?
Best Regards,
Sebastian