You should only call record_route() once.
From your previous post:
remove_hf("Route");
if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE"))
record_route();
if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) {
record_route();
handle_subscribe();
t_release();
It looks like you call the function twice.
Allen
From: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]
On Behalf Of Veerabhara Gundu
Sent: Thursday, 10 July 2014 9:18 a.m.
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: Need help with Routing presence NOTIFY messages
my problem is active-watchers table has NULL in record-routing column, not the routing.
For some reason, record-rote is not getting updated =in active-watchers table. Below is my
in dialog message processing.
# Handle requests within SIP dialogs
route[WITHINDLG] {
if (has_totag()) {
# sequential request withing a dialog should
# take the path determined by record-routing
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
if (is_method("BYE")) {
setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ...
setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the
transaction fails
}
else if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
# ACK is forwarded statelessy
route(NATMANAGE);
}
else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) {
# Add Record-Route for in-dialog NOTIFY as
per RFC 6665.
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
} else {
if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri ==
myself) {
# in-dialog subscribe requests
route(PRESENCE);
exit;
}
if ( is_method("ACK") ) {
if ( t_check_trans() ) {
# no loose-route, but stateful
ACK;
# must be an ACK after a 487
# or e.g. 404 from upstream
server
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {
# ACK without matching
transaction ... ignore and discard
exit;
}
}
sl_send_reply("404","Not here");
}
exit;
}
}
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Allen Zhang
<Allen.Zhang@imgtec.com<mailto:Allen.Zhang@imgtec.com>> wrote:
And you use loose_route() for in dialog requests?
From:
sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org>
[mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org>]
On Behalf Of Veerabhara Gundu
Sent: Wednesday, 9 July 2014 5:15 p.m.
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: Need help with Routing presence NOTIFY messages
I am using record route in config file for all dialog forming requests , but still
active_watchers table showing an empty record in record router column. Below is the config
file I ma using to process subscribe.
remove_hf("Route");
if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE"))
record_route();
also while processing subscribe
if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) {
record_route();
handle_subscribe();
t_release();
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Allen Zhang
<Allen.Zhang@imgtec.com<mailto:Allen.Zhang@imgtec.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Other please correct me if I’m wrong.
NOTIFY should use record-route header. Make sure your kamailio servers set the
record-route header for SUBSCRIBE requests.
Regards,
Allen
From:
sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org>
[mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org>]
On Behalf Of Veerabhara Gundu
Sent: Wednesday, 9 July 2014 3:25 p.m.
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users] Fwd: Need help with Routing presence NOTIFY messages
Hello Experts,
I have two Kamailio servers with built in presence servers with load balanced with DNS,
both sharing same data base. Registration, authentication and messaging are working
without any problem. When it comes to Presence, NOTIFY messages generated by Kamailio is
getting rejected by firewall if the client didn't register to that particular
Kamailio. In MESSAGES case, I read the socket info from Location table, if the client is
not registered to that Kamailio forwarded to the server which serving that user. But in
NOTIFY case, these messages are not coming to routing logic at all, Kamailio is directly
sending messages by looking at the contact information from active-watchers table.
One possible solution I am thinking is, separating presence logic and starting that as
separate server. That way I can play with contact header.
Any other thoughts, I appreciate any help with this. I have spent enough time on this.
Thanks,
Veera
Thanks,
Veera
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users