Re: [SR-Users] some issues with database initialization (berkeley/txt)

On 12/29/10 6:48 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

On 12/29/10 6:44 PM, Noa Resare wrote:

...

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:

On 12/27/10 2:09 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

    Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

        Juha, can the files for former lcr module tables 'gw' and
        'lcr' be
        removed?

    yes, in 3.1 lcr module uses these three tables: lcr_gw, lcr_rule,
    lcr_rule_target.

ok, done, cherry-picked in 3.1 for dbtext and db_berkeley.

Great. I tried building .debs from the 3.1 branch (last commit 553190) and indeed it reinits the database of DBTEXT type correctly. Not for db_berkeley though.

thanks for trying and reporting. db_berkely wasn't fixed indeed, I will do it in moments.

actually I backported for db_berkeley as well -- first time I thought i didn't do it.

However, the fix for db_berkely was done one day later than for dbtext, the commit hash 8442fb34 -- take again the latest version of the branch.

Cheers, Daniel