At 12:51 29/10/2007, Piyush.Bansal@relianceada.com wrote:
Hi Jiri,
We are quite used to of using ser-0.9.6. Now, since we,re switching to release-2.0.0-rc1 we want some documentation for the same. Are there any documents or pointers from where we can get some write ups for this release.
-jiri
thanx 'n' regds
[]
Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org
10/29/2007 02:35 AM To Piyush.Bansal@relianceada.com cc serusers@lists.iptel.org, serdev@lists.iptel.org Subject Re: [Serusers] [Serdev] SER Release 2 Query..
At 06:38 29/10/2007, Piyush.Bansal@relianceada.com wrote:
Hi jiri,
As per your suggestion, we tried to use release 2-0.0-rc1 for our usage. As far as the scripts are concerned to create database schema, the problem remains the same i.e. in the script there is No Provision For Creating subscriber and uri_db Table.
In which script? What subscriber table -- that's no longer in use.
And my second problem still remains the same with release 2-0.0-rc1 that the auth module doesn't contain the exported function which were there for challenging the Registering party (www_challenge, etc) at the time of Registration. Plz tell me if there is any other way to challenge the registering party in the new release or we're missing something??????
I suppose you are confusing yourself with a variety of versions, and suggest that you install clean ser, use the config makefile, play with ser_ctl and get some initial confidence with SER. Using multiple versions on the same system will for sure not work!
-jiri
plz reply asap....
regds,
[]
Jiri Kuthan jiri@iptel.org Sent by: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org
10/26/2007 10:20 AM To Piyush.Bansal@relianceada.com, serusers@lists.iptel.org, serdev@lists.iptel.org cc Subject Re: [Serusers] [Serdev] SER Release 2 Query..
At 14:49 26/10/2007, Piyush.Bansal@relianceada.com wrote:
Hi All,
I want to use SER which works with TLS and MySql - 5.0.*+ both. I think that is there in Release 2.* of SER.
While testing with the CVS Release of SER dated 22/10/2007, we faced lot of problems, as there was no provision for sending challenge to the Calling Party at the time of Registration.. And there is no Provision to make subscriber and uri_db table at the time of creation of Data Base schema...
Has anybody used this release????
Which -- CVS/HEAD? That's work in massive progress, I would be surprised if someone was using it for other purposes than development. (heavy DB overhaul)
Otherwise 2.0 should be fine with respect to the points you are raising.
-jiri
Plz tell me if there is anything to do with the configuration or what????
plz reply me ASAP.....
thanx in advance..
regds,
--Piyush Bansal _______________________________________________ Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ []
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/