30 Mar
2007
30 Mar
'07
8:19 a.m.
On 3/30/07, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Cesc writes:
:)
yes, i know, there is always two faces to a story ...
Look, the "my-work" example was just to show that being flexible and
open is not bad ... of course it takes more effort; this is like all
in life, pros and cons.
Basically, going back to the origins of this thread: I think we should
not bluntly discard new building ways just because one of the outcomes
may be a windows-based openser. Now, if all the porting needed can be
done with the current makefiles ... ok then.
Cesc
For one, in my company, we run
embedded linux AND windows embedded ... but we cannot have the same
proxy on both platforms, so you have to support two software units
... that is work!
why don't you ask your windows software to be ported to linux? then you
would have only one platform to worry about.
-- juha