24 Jul
2003
24 Jul
'03
11:32 p.m.
Hello, comments inline.
On 24-07 16:45, Juan J. Sierralta P. wrote:
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 16:17, Jan Janak wrote:
The problem I see with two instances is maintaing the users table
syncronized to get the email address.
You can use the same table as for the "routing" SIP server.
subscriber table (the table which contains usernames and
correspondings e-mails) is not modified by the proxy or voicemail,
so there is no need to synchronize it.
I mean the routing proxy will query the table to get credentials and
voicemail will query it to get email addresses.
First of
all thanks to SER developers for the great work.
I'm new to SIP and SER, I been playing with it a week ago and I was
able to setup a 0.8.11pre, and now I want to try the voicemail service.
It seems that I need to run another SER instance for voicemail and
redirect the requests to that instance.
No, you can run it on the same server.
It is posible to process the voicemail request
on the same instance I
use to forward/register users ?
Yes.
Or I need a second SER running. In case of 2 SER
servers, it is posible
to run them in the same box using diferent ports and diferent databases
?
Yes, if the servers listen on different ports and use different
databases. So is there an example out there how to implement
voicemail in the same
instance used for forwarding/register.
A sample config file for a voicemail running within another ser
instance is attached. Note that you can also put the snippets of the
config into the main proxy config, you need no separate instance.
Correct me if I'm wrong:
- I receive an INVITE for an offline user.
- I detect the offline status and must rewrite the uri in some way to
signal echo,conference or voicemail.
The problem I see if I rewrite the URI the VM will no be able to locate
the user's email address.
It uses To header field to get URI of the callee, To header
field URI never changes.
Jan.
PS: Please always CC the list.