Hi again,
Sorry, false alarm... We had a patch which disabled the callback from dialog to RR.
Regards, Kristian.
On Friday 27 November 2015 12:54:50 Kristian F. Høgh wrote:
Hi list,
Record-route on sequential requests doesn't have did/vsf parm.
On initial INVITE, I call record_route() and set dialog flag. kamailio adds the following RR Record-Route: sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2
UAC sends a re-INVITE, containing the following route: Route: sip:178.21.251.54;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2 I call loose_route() followed by record-route(), and kamailio adds the following RR: Record-Route: sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df
I've got a phone which updates the routeset on sequential requests (which I don't think it should) and the did-matching fails. Should kamailio add did/vsf on sequential requests, when I call record_route()? Should I set dlg_match_mode to 1? (I use 0) Is it wrong to call record_route() from sequential requests?
Which way is the best to resolve the problem?
Regards, Kristian Høgh Uni-tel A/S
*Kristian Høgh*
Telefon: 4422 8822 support@uni-tel.dk[1]
Gydevang 19 | 3450 Allerød www.uni-tel.dk [2]
-------- [1] mailto:support@uni-tel.dk [2] http://www.uni-tel.dk
