Re: [Users] check_route_param and rr_preset

Hi, I'm checking for a Re-Invite (Hold) The Invite from the UA is like this: SIP MESSAGE 1 10.46.11.132:5060() -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060() UDP Frame 1 28/Sep/06 10:45:38.0422 TimeFromPreviousSipFrame=0.0000 TimeFromStart=0.0000 INVITE sip:67512388@10.46.11.101:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.46.11.132;branch=z9hG4bKeb3ee7f3572b7f4b Route:<sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;lr=on;ftag=9f2aeb7dd809d46d;nat=yes;did=3c4.85d80b74> Route:<sip:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy;lr=on;ftag=9f2aeb7dd809d46d;nat=yes> I do a check_route_param("nat=yes") Should not this work? from the doc it says check_route_param: The function checks if the URI parameters of the local Route header (coresponding to the local server) I'm also calling the function after loose_route() br hw tor, 28,.09.2006 kl. 11.35 +0300, skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu: >Hi Helge, > >doesn't matter how you added the RR hdr - via record_route(), >record_route_preset() or append_hf(). When you receive a sequential >request, check_route_param("") will check the params of the >corresponding Route hdr. >Maybe it is a reg exp problem or the Route does not contain the param >you are looking for... > >regards, >bogdan > > >Helge Waastad wrote: > > > >>Hi, >>I was just wondering if the check_route_param("") works on >>record_route_preset Routes? >> >>It never hits when my Route: are, f.ex like >>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:<port>;nat=yes >> >>Is this true? >> >>br hw >> >> >> >> >>