Hm, 480 should be used for DND, I think. AFAIK, SJPhone should use 486, not sure about the others. g-)
Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com wrote:
Ser uses '486 busy here' for busy notifications which is correct according to rfc but sip phones like x-lite, 3CX Phone, SJPhone uses '480 temp unavailable here' for the same !!!!
Regards
Kamal Mann
*From:* Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:19 PM *To:* Mann, Kamal *Cc:* serusers@lists.iptel.org *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
You do lookup("aliases") and lookup("location") AFTER you have changed the uri through avp_pushto from usr_preferences. Is this really what you want? g-)
Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com mailto:Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com wrote:
Hi All I want to setup Blind call forwarding. Like if a uri - mann@iptel.org mailto:mann@iptel.org is not registered with SER but this user had already configured in ser database table usr_prefrences that his call should be forwarde to another uri kamal@iptel.org mailto:kamal@iptel.org. For that my usr_prefrence table is like
USR_PREFRENCES table
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
---------------+
| uuid | username | domain | attribute | value | type
|
modified |
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
----------------+
| | bhaskar | debian | callfwd | kamal@iptel.org mailto:kamal@iptel.org | 0 | 20060926165852 |
| | mann | iptel.org | callfwd | sip:kamal@iptel.org mailto:sip:kamal@iptel.org | 0
|
20060926150443 |
| | prateek | iptel.org | callfwd | kamal@iptel.org mailto:kamal@iptel.org | 0
|
20060926170701 |
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
----------------+
Is this entry is correct?? Is there any flaw in my ser.cfg?? Any help would be appreciated. Regards Kamal Mann -----Original Message----- From: Steve Blair [mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:26 PM To: Mann, Kamal Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
Does your config file relay REFER messages? It needs to in order to perform the transfer.
Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com mailto:Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com wrote:
Hi all
Please help out
*From:* Mann, Kamal *Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:46 PM *To:* 'serusers@lists.iptel.org mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org' *Subject:* RE: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
Hi all
I am implementing Blind call forwarding with 0.9.6 SER version. But with current configuration it's not working. Please help on same.
I am enclosing small part of usr_prefrences table & my ser.cfg.
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers