Yes you send both direction media information to the PCRF but when reply is received in precondition state.
On 04/23/2016 12:03 AM, José Seabra wrote:
Hello Ivailo and Franz,
Thank you for your clarifications.
Well sending an AAR when receive a reply makes all sense, but ims_qos must send the SDP information from the Initial Invite and also from 183 ringing or 200Ok, Am I correct?
Because PCRF needs to know the session parameters from Initial Initial INVITE and the reply to it.
The PCRF is a proprietary solution.
Thank you BR José Seabra
2016-04-22 21:54 GMT+01:00 Ivailo Dobrev <ivailod@telera.eu mailto:ivailod@telera.eu>:
Hi Franz, There no real OS PCRF. Yota/Telexir use to had some free VM image that is OK for test. You can search about FreePCRF. It is a little tricky to configure it but ... I made for my tests a really dummy one based on FreeDIAMETER. Generally speaking PCRF is the "brain" of the network and you should understand and design things well there. I have experience also w/ commercial PCRFs and there is no real answer yes this is a right way of making something. Cheers, Ivo On 04/22/2016 11:09 PM, Franz Edler wrote:Hi José, in principle it is possible to send an AAR after receiving the request. In this case the Service-Info-Status AVP is set to PRELIMINARY SERVICE INFORMATION. More efficient is it to wait until SDP answer is received and then the Service-Info-Status AVP is set to FINAL_SERVICE_INFORMATION. I don’t know if both methods are covered in ims_qos module. BTW: which PCRF are you using? Is there some open source PCRF available? BR Franz *From:*sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *José Seabra *Sent:* Friday, April 22, 2016 3:58 PM *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> *Subject:* [SR-Users] Kamailio IMS_QOS Hello There, I'm trying using the ims_qos module with PCRF for QOS, but I'm facing some issues. When kamailio receives an initial invite (originator), it will execute the function - "Rx_AAR("ORIG_SESSION_AAR","orig","",-1)", but the PCRF is not contacted and i see the following messages: 5(12153) DEBUG: <script>: Diameter: Orig authorizing media via Rx 5(12153) DEBUG: ims_qos [mod.c:609]: w_rx_aar(): Looking for route block [ORIG_SESSION_AAR] 5(12153) DEBUG: ims_qos [mod.c:621]: w_rx_aar(): Rx AAR called 5(12153) DEBUG: ims_qos [mod.c:1345]: create_return_code(): Creating return code of [-2] for aar_return_code 5(12153) DEBUG: ims_qos [mod.c:1354]: create_return_code(): created AVP successfully : [aar_return_code] 5(12153) DEBUG: ims_qos [mod.c:627]: w_rx_aar(): Can't do AAR for call session in request. Why kamailio says that I Can't do AAR for call session in request? I have looked into source code and I found that the condition that is blocking the communication with PCRF is: //We don't ever do AAR on request for calling scenario... if (msg->first_line.type != SIP_REPLY) { LM_DBG("Can't do AAR for call session in request\n"); return result; } Anyone can help me understand why it is happening? why it can't proceed if isn't a reply? Thank you for your support BR -- José Seabra _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users-- Cumprimentos José Seabra
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users