Re: [SR-Users] Replacing an ACME Packet Net-Net SBC

-- Fred Posner | The Palner Group, Inc. http://qxork.com > > Il giorno 21/feb/2014, alle ore 00:03, Fred Posner <fred@palner.com > mailto:fred@palner.com> ha scritto: > >> On 2/20/14, 5:55 PM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote: >>> @Carsten >>> I looked athttp://www.iptel.org/semsand seems to be only broken links >>> to downloads. >>> Do you know if the project is still maintained? >>> >>> @Fred >>> Are you using openser as a B2BUA? >> >> No, because of course Kamailio is not a b2bua. =) >> >> In the case of the ACME replacement, we used it to: >> >> - handle NAT (rtpproxy) >> - user regs >> - load balance >> - lcr >> - security >> - routing >> >> and some other little hacks. >> >> -- >> Fred Posner | The Palner Group, Inc. >> http://qxork.com http://qxork.com/ >> >>> >>> Il giorno 20/feb/2014, alle ore 19:42, Fred Posner <fred@palner.com >>> mailto:fred@palner.com> ha scritto: >>> >>>> Alex's article is one of my favorites. That being said, we switched >>>> out an Acme SBC for openser (at the time) and was immediately thrilled. >>>> >>>> Fred Posner >>>> The Palner Group, Inc. >>>> 503-914-0999 (direct) >>>> 954-472-2896 (fax) >>>> >>>> On 02/20/2014 01:14 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: >>>>> Francesco, >>>>> >>>>> Have a look at this blog post: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.likewise.am/2013/03/kamailio-as-an-sbc-session-border-controller/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That said, I agree with Carsten's suggestion of SEMS. >>>>> >>>>> On 02/20/2014 11:04 AM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an >>>>>> ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller. >>>>>> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly: >>>>>> >>>>>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations >>>>>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP >>>>>> carriers via SIP trunks >>>>>> - it is used for NAT traversal >>>>>> >>>>>> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC and >>>>>> this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server and >>>>>> the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks). >>>>>> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >>>>>> list >>>>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >