Re: [Serusers] Forking request - destination in branches?

Yes,

you have to change it by yourself or apply the second patch attached in the tracker.

Michal

On So, 2007-12-22 at 15:53 +0100, Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:

Hi Michal,

Unfortunately attr_destination and xlset_destination are not allow in the branch route. When one can expect the patch and those functions to be available in main tree??

Tomasz

On Dec 21, 2007 4:34 PM, Michal Matyska michal@iptel.org wrote: Hi,

    you can try to use patch available here:
    http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER-213

    Unfortunately it did not move into the main tree yet (and
    might be 
    little bit outdated at the moment).

    attr_destination and xlset_destination are available in the
    branch route
    and branch value is available using @tm.xxx select I think.

    Michal


    On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:29 +0100, Tomasz Zieleniewski wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I have following issue.
    > All my outgoing requests are forwarded through boundary
    proxy
    > by setting the destination before t_relay() 
    > my problem is when there is another branch created.
    > This second branch is routed in the standard SIP way
    > directly to destination in request URI.
    > How can I force also branches to go through my 
    > boundary proxy.
    > Can I somehow check in branch_route that this branch is not
    the first
    > one (not first message)
    > but the second and and change the destination and make
    t_relay()?
    >
    > Thank You for any feedback 
    >
    > Regards
    > Tomasz

    > _______________________________________________
    > Serusers mailing list
    > Serusers@lists.iptel.org
    > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers