Hi again,
I have read about core dump and most mentioned that I have to do a backtrace
to get the reason behind the crash.
As a newbie in this field am not able to generate Where do I should stand
and reproduce the gdb command, all my trials resulted with 'No Stack' as
below!
I did the following:
debian:/usr/local/sbin/kamailio# gdb $kamailio_binary $core_file
GNU gdb 6.8-debian
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
<http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu".
(gdb) bt full
No stack.
(gdb)
Where is my mistake?
Again if needed syslog output before Kamailio crash!
Feb 29 06:44:42 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: INFO: usrloc
[hslot.c:53]: locks array size 512
Feb 29 06:44:42 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: INFO: drouting
[drouting.c:272]: DRouting - initializing
Feb 29 06:44:42 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: INFO: <core>
[udp_server.c:179]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 111616
Feb 29 06:44:42 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: INFO: <core>
[udp_server.c:230]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142
Feb 29 06:44:42 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: INFO: <core>
[udp_server.c:179]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 111616
Feb 29 06:44:42 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: INFO: <core>
[udp_server.c:230]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142
Feb 29 06:44:42 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4294]: INFO: ctl
[io_listener.c:225]: io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method
(config)
Feb 29 06:45:03 debian kernel: [17504.541952] kamailio[4296]: segfault at
bf7e3ee4 ip b6cc2c38 sp bf7e3e70 error 6 in drouting.so[b6cb7000+1d000]
Feb 29 06:45:03 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4304]: : <core>
[pass_fd.c:293]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 5
Feb 29 06:45:03 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: ALERT: <core>
[main.c:751]: child process 4296 exited by a signal 11
Feb 29 06:45:03 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: ALERT: <core>
[main.c:754]: core was generated
Feb 29 06:45:03 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4280]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:766]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD
Feb 29 06:45:03 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4281]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 29 06:45:03 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4282]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Thanks in advance.
BR,
F.Chahrour
From: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Stoyan Mihaylov
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 7:37 PM
To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] DRouting cause Kamailio 3.2 to stop
You can start kamailio from prompt directly - of course logged as root:
kamailio {parameters - including cfg file}
If you are using ubuntu - it is more tricky - first you should create root
user, or may be you can start with:
sudo kamailio {parameters}
I never started kamailio using kamctrl. I am starting it through little
modified init script.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Fatima Chahrour~ Vanrise Technical Support
<fchahrour(a)vanrise.com> wrote:
Stayon, start kamailio as root means using kamctrl start?
Regards,
Fatima
From: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Stoyan Mihaylov
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 5:05 PM
To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] DRouting cause Kamailio 3.2 to stop
I am working with kamailio from 3 months or so. And we use it only as
registrar and load balance. All routing is done from Asterisks which are
behind kamailio. I only "route" using ds_select_dst - to select Asterisk
where to forward call.
I dont like signal 15 - looks like crash from wrong arguments or something
alike (but same signal you will see if you manually shut down kamailio). I
have no experience with module you use.
Next steps you can do are - to increase debug level, and again to look at
tail, especially in moment of dial - when kamailio crashes. You can check
also core dumps - how you can do it - there is discussion now about it -
important thing is may be you should start kamailio as root.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Fatima Chahrour~Vanrise Support
<fchahrour(a)vanrise.com> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I have checked, and I have one question, from analyzing two points:
- 1st point is that before adding the drouting scripts no problem
with kamailio and no crash, but after adding the script in the routing logic
kamailio app dies
- 2nd point if I have have any wrong data in the database and try
to call, I get the ("503", "No Rules matching the URI") on the
x-lite
So both points doesn't mean that the problem lies in the scripts I have in
the routing logic area? (Also please note that I have got these scripts
after checking the kamailio doc and other google doc that applied drouting
scenario using kamailio 1.5.0).
Following your advice, I have check the syslog file before and after
performing the call and am getting the below
1)When I start kamailio I have the following in syslog :
an:/usr/local/etc/kamailio# kamctl start
INFO: Starting Kamailio :
INFO: started (pid: 19296)
debian:/usr/local/etc/kamailio# tail -f /var/lo
local/ lock/ log/
debian:/usr/local/etc/kamailio# tail -f /var/log/syslog
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian kamailio: WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:1275]:
WARNING: fix_hostname: could not rev. resolve 192.168.111.139
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian kamailio: WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:1275]:
WARNING: fix_hostname: could not rev. resolve 192.168.111.139
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian kamailio: INFO: <core> [tcp_main.c:4727]: init_tcp:
using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected)
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19296]: INFO: usrloc
[hslot.c:53]: locks array size 512
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19296]: INFO: drouting
[drouting.c:272]: DRouting - initializing
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19296]: INFO: <core>
[udp_server.c:179]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 111616
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19296]: INFO: <core>
[udp_server.c:230]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19296]: INFO: <core>
[udp_server.c:179]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 111616
Feb 24 05:57:30 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19296]: INFO: <core>
[udp_server.c:230]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142
Feb 24 05:57:31 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19310]: INFO: ctl
[io_listener.c:225]: io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method
(config)
2) When I do the call from x-lite by dialing 961222222, after few seconds I
get Call Failed: Request Timeout on x-lite, and the syslog shows:
an:/usr/local/etc/kamailio# tail -f /var/log/syslog
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19305]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19309]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19310]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19314]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19312]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19316]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19307]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19320]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19318]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
Feb 24 06:00:39 debian /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19301]: INFO: <core>
[main.c:817]: INFO: signal 15 received
There is no error raised; So, shall I consider this as Kamailio crash and
focus my search on this as you mentioned previously? Or I need help in
achieving correct route script in the routing logic?
Thanks,
F.Chahrour
From: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Stoyan Mihaylov
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 2:48 PM
To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] DRouting cause Kamailio 3.2 to stop
I suppose - kamailio crashes. You can run in console on same server:
tail -f /var/log/syslog
or you can tail file where sys logs are stored.
There - you can see some debugs, and you can check discussion about kamailio
crashes and how to get dump file.
This way you will identify problem and then either you will fix your cfg
file, or you can report bug.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Fatima Chahrour~Vanrise Support
<fchahrour(a)vanrise.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am newly experiencing kamailio 3.2. I have installed kamailio and MySQL
and tried the test call from 1 PC(x-lite) to another PC(x-lite) and ended
successfully.
Now moving further, I have configured dynamic routing module and applied
needed parameters and scripts to finally be able to start kamailio without
any issue. Also I set a testing scenario in the related database tables
BUT my problem is that whenever am trying to call the predefined prefix
(961) from x-lite am getting a 'calling' message on it and then request
timeout where I find that kamailio has stopped running. I kamctrl start
again and call 961 then get calling so I wait and kamailio stps again. Below
is the script used in the routing logic and database record.
Any help to achieve a successful call is highly appreciated.
dr_gatways: 3, 1, '192.168.111.15', 0, '', '', 2,
'PC1'
dr_groups: 2, '.*', '.*', 0, 'Anyone'
dr_gw_lists: 2, '3', 'Test Call'
dr_rules: 2, '0', '961', '', 0, '1',
'#2', 'Lebanon Fix'
####### Routing Logic ########
# main request routing logic
route{
if (is_method("INVITE")) {
setflag(1); # do accounting
route(4); # Call our dynamic route.
}
}
..
..
..
route[4] {
if (!do_routing("0")) {
send_reply("503", "No Rules matching the URI");
exit;
}
if (is_method("INVITE")) {
t_on_failure("4");
}
route(RELAY);
}
..
..
..
failure_route[4] {
if (use_next_gw()) {
t_relay();
exit;
} else {
t_reply ("503", "Service not available");
exit;
}
}
Thanks in Advance,
F.Chahrour
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users