Actually, both methods can be better understood by looking at the "FOO" RFC (take a look at RFC3092 : http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3092.txt)
Also, FOOBAR is referenced by RFC 2577, ("FTP Operation Over Big Address Records") and explained in RFC 1639 (http://rfc.dotsrc.org/rfc/rfc1639.html).
Have fun, and never underestimate the power of ietf ! :-)
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 00:33 +0100, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 8 de Febrero de 2008, Klaus Darilion escribió:
Victor Pascual Ávila schrieb:
Jerome,
On Feb 7, 2008 7:05 PM, Jerome Martin jmartin@longphone.fr wrote:
I would say such a document would be terribly difficult to write as RFC conformance also depends a lot on what you do in the configuration scripts ...
Yes, you are right. But actually could be listed which RFCs may be supported by a given version.
That's really difficult. Openser is a proxy. E.g. RFC 2976, the INFO method. Openser is a proxy, thus it can forward all kind of SIP requests. Not only INFO, but also FOOBAR, CHICKEN and so on.
Hi Klaus,
I've been looking long time for the RFC describing the SIP CHICKEN method but I can't find it. Could you point me that RFC or draft?
:-D
Jérôme Martin | LongPhone Responsable Architecture Réseau 122, rue la Boetie | 75008 Paris Tel : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 44 Fax : +33 (0)1 56 26 28 45 Mail : jmartin@longphone.fr Web : www.longphone.com