Its 2.4.18. So it could have been another problem here. All that we now is that we first tested here and then tested on a D-Link 604. Both failed so we switched to plan B, which was to make the UA generate the ping. After that all our UAs have worked perfectly with the rtpproxy.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nils Ohlmeier" nils@ohlmeier.de To: "Ricardo Villa" ricvil@epm.net.co; "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org; "Hans Eriksson" hansa@mac.com Cc: "Klaus Darilion" darilion@ict.tuwien.ac.at; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:45 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] symmetric nat/ broadband routers
Am Thursday 04 December 2003 21:22 schrieb Ricardo Villa:
On our lab we have a RH7.3 box with iptables firewall and NAT. When we were initially testing the nathelper module we found out that external pings did NOT keep the sessions alive on this box. Only pings going
from
inside towards the internet. At that point we decided to simply rely on the ability of devices like the ATA186 and GS phones to send a SIP Dummy packet from behind the NAT in order to keep the sessions alive. So far this approach has worked 100%. It is possible that the Linux box just needed some tweaking, but we needed a solution that worked seamlessly
with
all customers.
I do not know which kernel version RH7.3 uses, but for Linux kernel
version
2.4 this is not true. I have a Linux router with 2.4 kernel as NAT box running. And a phone behind this NAT is perfectly reachable, because the
NAT
pings keep the connection tracking open. The default timeout for
established
UDP connections is 180 sections. If the natpinger is below that value it keeps tha hole open. at least for me :-)
Greets Nils
I belive we also tested another common broadband home router and it
behaved
the same way.
Regards, Andres
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org To: "Hans Eriksson" hansa@mac.com Cc: "Klaus Darilion" darilion@ict.tuwien.ac.at; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:09 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] symmetric nat/ broadband routers
On 04-12 18:12, Hans Eriksson wrote:
Klaus,
Many commersial grade firewalls do not keep sessions alive,
regardsless
of external pings, so it won't work in rather too many cases.
Which firewalls behave this way, do you have any particular in mind
?
What makes you think that many firewall require traffic from inside
to
keep the mapping open ?
Jan.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers