Hello guys,
also kamilio is running on a container with hostNetwork: true so it should
use the correct port.
The VIA looks ok (advertised ip and port are there)
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 12:50 PM David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello guys,
maybe i need to add that i'm sending the call out from the internal fs
using the outbound_proxy parameter.
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 12:31 PM David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> i'm seeing something weird, and i'm working if you can let me know.
> I have a kamailio in AWS with a private IP listening on several sockets:
>
> Listening on
> udp: 10.1.2.36:5070
> udp: 10.1.2.36:5080
> udp: 10.1.2.36:5160 advertise 4.3.2.1:5160
> udp: 0.0.0.0:5066
> tls: 10.1.2.36:443 advertise sip.something.com:443
> tls: 10.1.2.36:444 advertise sip.something.com:444
> tls: 10.1.2.36:5061
>
> When forwarding a udp invite received on 10.1.2.36:5080 to a public ip
> provider say on 8.8.8.8:5060, i'm forcing the outgoing socket with
> force_socket via 10.1.2.36:5160. But the outgoing invite does NOT use
> 5160, it uses some random port...
>
> Anybody knows why this might be?
>
> my problem is, that call goes to freeswitch... call is setup properly and
> connects fine. But 15 minutes later the end provider sends back a reINVITE,
> which freeswitch then sends TO THE RANDOM PORT kamailio used to send the
> INVITE... but by this time kamailio doesn't seem to even see the packet...
>
> help is greatly appreciated!
>
> David
>
> Regards,
>
> David Villasmil
> email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com
>
>