7 Mar
2010
7 Mar
'10
5:13 p.m.
Hi Inaki,
On 03/05/2010 05:09 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, if somebody is bored and has 5-10 minutes of spare
time I suggest to read
the mail I've sent to sip-implementors maillist, full of hate and fury:
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2010-
March/024529.html
sad, but true! Your conclusions are right.
I think we have to find ourselves a way in SIP to go the xmpp approach,
which means: first implement then specify. IM & Presence are basic
services in IP communication, they simply must work.
I would impose a rule in IETF that each rfc must have one
prototype/reference implementation before approval. Otherwise they will
keep pushing generic and complex service architectures.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio SIP Router Masterclass, Berlin, March 22-26, 2010
* http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/