On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 20:10 +0100, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Jueves, 10 de Enero de 2008, Jerome Martin escribió:
To summarize, I'd say that if you rely on RTP detection for billing, then you have the following limitations :
- unreliable problem detection
- stuck with RTP proxying for ALL calls
- problems with VAD
- problems in corner cases with re INVITES changing the RTP stream
extremities
What do you think ?
I think that I should thank to you for a great explanation ;)
What, you're not even arguing ? :-) You're too kind. But seriously, this is a pretty hot subject, and I've never met anyone suggesting the same as I did here, most of the time I hear the same thing about rtpproxy + CDRs reliability.
I'm sure some people are challenging what I wrote right now, in their mind ! If we are lucky, we'll even get emails !
Disclaimer: the above paragraph was not meant to start a flame war on the topic between SST/pinging schools and RTP detection ones. At worst, the two techniques can really complement each other.
Regards,