1 - Why do you get two different SET Ids for two asterisk servers ? Is it intentional ? 2 - Please ensure that after failing back to primary the linux routes are working and there is no issue with network layer connectivity. Also how are your calls failing ? What do Kamailio complain ? Enable SIP debug on your asterisk server and get a tcpdump on your kamailio server when you get this issue. Im pretty sure tcpdump will tell you whats happening. On Nov 28, 2012 10:07 PM, "Rumen Mihailov" zealas1662@gmail.com wrote:
The two configuration files are 100% identical.
On 28 November 2012 19:01, Rumen Mihailov zealas1662@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again and thank you for your help,
This is what happened when I changed the flags to 8 and restarted both
kamailios
ACTIVE KAMAILIO SET_NO:: 2 SET:: 2 URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=AP priority=1 attrs= SET:: 1 URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=AP priority=1 attrs=
PASSIVE KAMAILIO SET_NO:: 1 SET:: 1 URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs=
When I stop kamailio 1 kamailio two takes the Virtual IP and everything works like a charm, when I start kamailio 1 again the same issue appears calls are only routed to the 10.2.45.103 asterisk....
What might be the problem that they are in different set ?
On 28 November 2012 18:37, SamyGo govoiper@gmail.com wrote:
Well these are two different dispatcher groups, one is SET:1 10.2.45.98 where the calls are routed - the other one is SET:2 which you are
definitely
not calling in your ds_select() function.
Also the flags=IP are, I think, saying that asterisk servers are
inactive
and kamailio is probing them, not sure about it. mine always show me flags=AP for active servers.
Also how have you defined the
ds_ping_reply_codes
http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/3.2.x/modules_k/dispatcher.html#id24959...
Parameter such that if asterisk responds with a 484 or 404 or anyother negative response to the dispatcher OPTIONS SIP ping then consider it active.
Hope this will get your issue resolved.
The thing is the dispatcher in kamailio or load-balancer in OpenSIPS
both
set the Initial flags of all the servers in the table to Active/Enabled
!
that means if I have a server which is down and I reload the dispatcher module it will mark that down server to UP and my calls will timeout
trying
to send calls to that instance !
Thanks, Sammy
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Rumen Mihailov zealas1662@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Samy,
this is what I got:
SET_NO:: 2 SET:: 2 URI:: sip:10.2.45.103:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs= SET:: 1 URI:: sip:10.2.45.98:5060 flags=IP priority=1 attrs=
on both machines. Moreover now without any changes dispatcher is not working at all. Only sending calls to the asterisk-1 (10.2.45.98)
On 28 November 2012 18:20, SamyGo govoiper@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
I think instead of dispatcher show use "kamctl dispatcher dump" That will show you the kamailio status of these servers. The flag 0, I'm not
sure
about that I always use 8 to re-activate the server if the ping gets back.
Hope to hear from you
Sammy
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Rumen Mihailov <
zealas1662@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello again,
I was able to perform tests and this is the output: Kamailio-1: 10.2.45.106 Kamailio-2: 10.2.45.109 Asterisk-1: 10.2.45.98 Asterisk-2: 10.2.45.103
I can ping both asterisks from both kamailios here are stats: FROM KAMAILIO-1 [root@kamailio-1 ~]# ping 10.2.45.98 PING 10.2.45.98 (10.2.45.98) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.315 ms ^C --- 10.2.45.98 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 773ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.315/0.315/0.315/0.000 ms [root@kamailio-1 ~]# ping 10.2.45.103 PING 10.2.45.103 (10.2.45.103) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.489 ms 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.268 ms
FROM KAMAILIO-2 [root@kamailio-2 ~]# ping 10.2.45.98 PING 10.2.45.98 (10.2.45.98) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.46 ms 64 bytes from 10.2.45.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.324 ms ^C --- 10.2.45.98 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1036ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.324/0.893/1.462/0.569 ms [root@kamailio-2 ~]# ping 10.2.45.103 PING 10.2.45.103 (10.2.45.103) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.09 ms 64 bytes from 10.2.45.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.350 ms ^C
Those are the 'kamctl dispatcher show' outputs: KAMAILIO 1 [root@kamailio-1 ~]# kamctl dispatcher show dispatcher gateways
+----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
| id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs | description |
+----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
| 1 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.98:5060 | 0 | 1 | | asterisk-1 | | 2 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.103:5060 | 0 | 1 | | asterisk-2 |
+----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
KAMAILIO 2 [root@kamailio-2 ~]# kamctl dispatcher show dispatcher gateways
+----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
| id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs | description |
+----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
| 1 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.98:5060 | 0 | 1 | | asterisk-1 | | 2 | 1 | sip:10.2.45.103:5060 | 0 | 1 | | asterisk-2 |
+----+-------+----------------------+-------+----------+-------+-------------------+
Both asterisks can also ping both kamailios
ds_select_dst("1","4");
this is what I have in my route[TOASTERISK]
Any thought guys ?
Best regards, Rumen
On 28 November 2012 09:55, Rumen Mihailov zealas1662@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hello Samy, > > Thank you for the hint, I will test later today and let you know
the
> results. > > Best regards, > Rumen > > On 28 November 2012 07:00, SamyGo govoiper@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just few quick questions , can you ping the second asterisk from >> secondary >> Kamailio ? what is the routing set for that. Does your second >> asterisk >> box >> gets inactive in dispatcher show command after 30 seconds ? >> Mine worked fine, the key is the linux routing table. >> >> BR >> Sammy >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Rumen Mihailov >> zealas1662@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> .s. Thank you for creating such a wonderful product. Thank you
!!!
>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing
>> list >> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users