Re: [SR-Users] is $td.did avp a normal avp?

On 4/26/11 9:20 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: actually, to give further clarifications, the script variable lookup for $xyz is like: - search in K-style PV table for 'xyz' name and if found use it - if not found, treat it as AVP So, $xyz (literally) is practically the same as $avp(xyz). When the integration happened, it was discovered there was no critical overlapping between existing PV names and ser avp lists - as mentioned in this thread, ser had lately several avp classes, using a dot to mark the end of the class and the start of the avp name. In the past a non-existing PV name in K would have thrown error, now is considered to be classic K AVP (in ser style it is from uri avp). Now the $avp(...) PV supports all classes, so you can use for example $avp(td.did). If the avp class is missing, then it is the 'f' class, afaik based on some emails sent in the past on the lists -- so these should be equivalent in the config file: - $myavp - $f.myavp - $avp(myavp) - $avp(f.myavp) However, you better test the above equivalency, since I am using only K-style avps. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com